Suç İşlemeye Tahrik Suçu
Provocation to Commit an Offence

It is seen that the crime of Provocation to Commit an Offence is a problematic regulation. That is why, the regulation in old Turkish Penal Code with rule number 765, has been the subject of many studies, including monographic works. Since the regulation of this crime shows some problems in the context of the general theory of crime, numerous discussions have been made on its legal nature, in order to legitimize it within terms of general theory of crime (general principle of criminal law). Although it included some important changes, this offense after the transfer of the offense in the new Turkish Penal Code in year 2005, was not sufficiently discussed. Here an attempt is made to clarify the legal nature of the current regulation in criminal theory with reference to the old discussions.
Keywords: Provocation to commit a crime, Provocation, Failed instigation/incitement, Crimes as
provocations subject, Widening the field of punishment

Determination of the completion and termination of theft and robbery under Turkish law in the light of robbery-like theft under German law

With this study, the crime of robbery-like theft, regulated in section 252 of the German Penal Code, will be discussed, and then, within the framework of the obtained criteria, the time of completion of the theft and robbery crimes in Turkish law will be determined. Hereinafter we will try to explain how the cases that are similar to the acts that are transformed from theft to robbery-like theft will be determined in current Turkish law. Since the completion and termination of the crime have effects in the context of voluntary abandonment and active remorse, these issues will be clarified through similar cases.

Keywords: Theft using force or threats to retain possession of stolen property, Theft, Robbery, Robbery-like theft, Theft-like robbery